Update Indie Ring Reddish Velvet Speaks Close Their Negotiation Alongside Sm

Pann: SM's novel daughter grouping is on!!

=====

1. [+68, -33] Hello, I'm a Red Velvet fellow member Ha Hee Soo. Before nosotros posted online, nosotros tried to contact SM. We wouldn't know when they'd read our emails in addition to they didn't answer the telephone calls therefore nosotros posted online first. We exclusively idea of recording in addition to promoting therefore nosotros didn't visit farther to larn our refer copyrighted. We obtained copyrights exclusively for the vocal nosotros released. Red Velvet is a mutual give-and-take of a loving cup cake therefore overlapping could happen. I approximate SM tin purpose it without whatever problems because it's non copyrighted, but they said this was the outset time, right? It's really rare to unloosen albums nether the same name. If they searched, therefore they could easily constitute that Red Velvet was already nether use. The director said it was a mistake. They said they didn't know close it in addition to blamed it on the staff. But from what I've heard, SM has many meetings, I uncertainty that they truly didn't create whatever research. I mean value they named the squad late. They would've known it if they looked it upward at least. I mean value it would've been amend if they informed us outset in addition to asked to last excused. We met upward in addition to decided to purpose the same name. People are proverb that we're getting known due to SM but it's non similar nosotros wanted this. Even if it took a long time, nosotros wanted to last recognized alongside our music. They wouldn't conduct keep dealt alongside it if they didn't refer it similar this, it's a pity. We volition simply piece of occupation on to create our music. Thank yous for reading a long post.

2. [+54, -7] But weren't in that location articles proverb that Red Velvet was already used past times rookie singers?

3. [+38, -21] They should alter their refer earlier promoting. Why are people downvoting me though? Aren't I right?

4. [+16, -2] But I uncovering the indie band Red Velvet a fight nonsense. Whether they already released songs alongside the refer or not, it doesn't affair if they didn't copyright it. Honestly Red Velvet is a cake refer therefore anyone could've idea of the name. They didn't fifty-fifty copyright it therefore it's incorrect to claim that it was theirs. They're proverb that SM should've done about interrogation on music sites, but Red Velvet wasn't fifty-fifty inward the copyrights inward the outset place. Do yous truly mean value they'll search on music sites when Red Velvet isn't copyrighted? Red Velvet is already getting therefore much loathe simply because they're an SM grouping in addition to straightaway they're getting to a greater extent than loathe alongside the name. As a fan of a Red Velvet fellow member since she was an SM rookie, it's frustrating. It's skilful that both parties negotiated to purpose the same refer but it's however uncomfortable

5. [+16, -1] I mean value the indie band Red Velvet is a fight stupid ㅠㅠ If they had the fourth dimension to post online, therefore they should've copyrighted it first!!! SM in all likelihood used the refer because it wasn't copyrighted ㅠㅠ But the indie band's vocal pops upward if yous search Red Velvet, SM is an idiot, too... The daughter grouping is already getting therefore much loathe in addition to this... tsk tsk

Share this post