Update Lee Seung Chul Gets Into A Conflict Amongst Junsu's Fans For His Remake Song

Article: Lee Seung Chul has a conflict amongst fans of JYJ Junsu for his remake vocal promotion

On the 16th, Lee Seung Chul tweeted "what's the indicate of raging over something I said when I wasn't serious" "I'll never live on able to come across Junsu again. It's a pity"

Lee Seung Chul's vocal "I'm inward Love" is an OST of a drama as well as is a remake of JYJ Junsu's vocal inward his sec solo album. 

At first, JYJ fans pointed out that Lee Seung Chul never mentioned nearly the master copy vocal as well as it made it seem similar LSC's version was the master copy one. 

The province of affairs was settled when it was revealed that the composer of the vocal as well as Kim Junsu's reps agreed to it. But on the fourth, he posted on his fan cafe, "remakes ordinarily don't refer master copy singers" "The wiser thing for Junsu's fans to practise is to brand his vocal win #1 as well as larn it known more. It's bitter how they're demanding an official apology without whatsoever honor for a sunbae who's thirty years senior."

=====

1. [+699, -32] Didn't he brand a remake of Kim Taewon's "Flashback 3" as well as unloosen it without permission? I heard that they direct maintain a bad human relationship because of that. I gauge he's the virile individual monarch of picking upwards other singers' songs... If he wants to live on respected for his experience, why didn't he honor Kim Taewon? You stole the song, released a remake of it as well as hitting big...

2. [+132, -10] The fans didn't complain nearly the remake. His vocal was beingness promoted equally if it was an master copy vocal thence the fans requested to refer the master copy vocalist as well as the official tweet was "Lee Seung Chul showtime got this vocal inward 2013 (he didn't unloosen it, he only got the song) It's Kim Junsu's error to unloosen the vocal without permission." The fans demanded an apology for the tweet. Why is Lee Seung Chul making it seem similar the fans are complaining nearly the remake?

3. [+120, -11] The fans were frustrated but they decided to permit it exceed but your tweets are bringing to a greater extent than criticisms to you. When you lot larn old, you lot exclusively larn greedy. Take fourth dimension as well as reverberate how you lot behaved towards your music hoobae as well as their fans. I'm non proverb that it's Lee Seung Chul's fault, but he should've corrected the province of affairs when it went wrong.

4. [+111, -9] Why should nosotros honor him when we're only the audience? Why does it affair to us that he has thirty years onetime of experience?

5. [+101, -9] Lee Seung Chul looks arrogant these days. Whether you're onetime or not, you lot direct maintain to apologize if you lot did something wrong. I don't empathize why Lee Seung Chul's personalities hap getting worse equally he ages.

6. [+98, -10] I'm inward Love is a b-side rails inward Junsu's album... The world doesn't actually know it because it was never broadcasted, but the fans similar the vocal a lot... We're non proverb that making a remake is wrong, but making it equally an OST as well as tweeting to tell us that nosotros should experience honored... this is the problem

7. [+90, -7] If it was the error of the OST staff, thence he should've only ended at that. What's amongst the tweets proverb that it's originally Lee Seung Chul's vocal as well as that the fans should only rest quiet? You made this province of affairs bigger

8. [+83, -6] He stole Kim Taewon's "Flashback3" as well as released it equally "Last Concert". Why does he hap stealing other people's work? Even though it's legally non wrong, it's morally wrong. The world accepted him fifty-fifty though he had many scandals similar marijuana because he's a skillful vocalist but he's only an arrogant ahjussi.

Share this post