Update Kang Seung Yoon Says Winning #1, Two On Digital Nautical Chart Isn't Difficult Alongside Fandom & Recognition
Wednesday 16 January 2019
Edit
Q) With your concluding album, the songs 'lined up' on the chart. Are yous worried close nautical chart ranking?
Kang Seung Yoon: "These days, winning #1, two on a digital nautical chart is non that hard. If yous receive got plenty fandom too recognition, winning #1, two isn't also hard. But at the end, Blue Planet has to psyche to it to concluding long."
-
Pann: Fuck... it makes me swear. He says #1, two is easy.
1. [+211, -67] There are singers that receive got been some for years but never win #1 whereas some receive got been some for four five years to win #1. There are novel idols every fourth dimension too it's harder to win #1 too survive. His disputation is iffy. The fans must've streamed difficult to brand his vocal #1. He's ignoring the fans' effort.
2. [+196, -82] The interview was afterwards his songs dropped from #1, 2. I mean value he said winning #1, two isn't difficult because they're inwards YG amongst recognition. He thus said the music is to a greater extent than of import to concluding long.
3. [+155, -56] What is this... It's making me upset.
4. [+95, -6] I don't mean value he's maxim that winning #1, two on a digital nautical chart is easy. He's maxim that #1, two is slow every bit long every bit yous receive got a stable fandom that does a lot of streaming. If yous receive got recognition, a lot of people volition psyche to your songs whether they're practiced or bad. But they're non crucial for longevity. Kang Seung Yoon used incorrect words. Please sympathize him, some singers are but terrible at speaking. Just accept it every bit a pity.
5. [+80, -17] Then what does that brand other idols who won #1 afterwards years ㅋㅋ The fans streamed thus difficult too he says charting high isn't hard... The fans must live dumbfounded.
6. [+78, -9] Isn't Kang Seung Yoon is maxim that winning #1, two temporarily is slow amongst a fandom, but charting for a long fourth dimension needs the public? I don't mean value it's wrong.