Update Previous Endure Of Iu's Mv Manager + Lovelyz In Addition To Shinee's Lolita & Shotacon Concepts?

Pann: Director of IU's MV uploaded a post

Director of IU's 'Twenty-Three' music video posted: 
"The argue why there's milk on her shirt is because she dropped the milk as well as it got on her shirt. The chair spun as well as it was perfectly coincidental."

1. [+407, -53] There are all the same unanswered suspicions. 1) Zeze inwards the album cover. 2) Lolita signs, gestures, as well as props inwards IU's previous album photos (the mass titles behind IU inwards a photograph shoot, divulge 68 behind the painting of You as well as I, lolita cinema references inwards pictures of Red Shows album) I'm writing this because the music video isn't the exclusively origin of this controversy.

2. [+351, -57] ㅋㅋㅋㅋ I tin sack exclusively express joy at how he says the milk was coincidental

3. [+278, -23] And the individual who drew the album fine art needs to clarify... The fishnet stockings as well as pin-up daughter pose.

-

Pann: Previous travel of the manager of IU's Twenty Three

1. [+295, -8] I'm a video major as well as I was speechless when I read the director's feedback. The music video was sum of clichés that whatsoever video majors tin sack tell. He didn't notice them? I don't mean value that the manager as well as IU were determined to cinema a music video amongst a sum lolita concept. But did y'all actually non notice the bloom as well as milk, which are really obvious clichés? Director-nim, y'all said it was exclusively to plough over some colors but y'all all the same didn't fifty-fifty explicate why the bloom was there. Why are y'all proverb that the populace is the pervert when the music video is sum of clichés? I'm disappointed, y'all actually didn't know? It mightiness non hold upward a lolita concept but I'm sure as shooting y'all knew it was sexual. You could've used another props then. Why did y'all fifty-fifty upload the sketch of the music video? It made y'all less credible. Did y'all endeavour to fool the populace amongst such unreliable sketch?

2. [+287, -4] There's no agency a cinema manager wouldn't notice those things. It's sum of clichés, if he actually didn't know, therefore he should alter his job. Why the hell is he a MV manager when he doesn't fifty-fifty select the knowledge? If he actually truly didn't know, therefore it's the affair of his ignorance. He should hold upward ashamed of calling himself a MV director.

3. [+284, -5] And yet he says he didn't await milk to hold upward interpreted inwards this way

-

Pann: Lovelyz's lolita concept

School uniforms

Close-up scenes on legs as well as feet

1. [+95, -4] ???? The whole music video is most high schoolhouse girls having fun similar a teen movie. What crap is this? Do y'all desire to hold upward jailed? You took screencaps of the MV to postal service this? Yeah they're pretty, right? Become a fan then.

2. [+73, -0] There were articles of their skirts because they were never revealing. You're therefore ignorant. If you're an IU fan as well as posting this only to drag other idols, you're really wrong. It's non similar Lovelyz fans made IU's controversy. If y'all desire to defend IU, y'all involve to convey evidences that tin sack refute IU's controversy. There's nix lolita most Lovelyz. It's non an innocent-sexy concept, either.

3. [+69, -2] The scenes are non emphasizing legs. Those were cute scenes where someone was secretly leaving jellies. I can't believe this is misinterpreted equally lolita ㅠㅠ There's also this scene of Soojung amongst a jelly on her face.

-

Pann: Girls' double standards are giving me goosebumps, they larn crazy over SHINee's shotacon concept

(Pann talks most SHINee's Juliette concept equally shotacon)

1. [+56, -3] Fuck, I adore Juliette concept the most but they're treating this similar shotacon. Juliette is a concept of boy + fairy!!!! SM never set whatsoever sexual codes inwards SHINee. The MV of Juliette is generally trip the low-cal fantastic toe except the scene of coming together Juliette. There's nix sexual most it. The album arts are the members fighting amongst H2O guns as well as bubbles, it was a mysterious as well as innocent concept of fairies!!! Are y'all proverb that this is shotacon because they were asset daughter dolls? It was to symbolize Juliette. It's non a flush betwixt a man child as well as an ajumma, it was a dearest flush betwixt a daughter as well as a boy. There's a b-side called "Boy Meets Girl' (English championship is Romeo + Juliette). What shotacon are y'all talking about? SHINee is beingness dragged because of a recent controversy. I dislike IU because of her disputation but this makes me dislike her fifty-fifty more. Thanks. IU is forever gone inwards my midpoint

2. [+54, -3] SHINee doesn't select sexual elements to hold upward called shotacon. Your encephalon is dumb.

3. [+43, -3] People proceed proverb SHINee's concept is shotacon but it's not. They were showing the freshness of boys. With Juliette, SHINee didn't emphasize their trunk parts, brand obedient faces, or pose inwards sure as shooting ways. It was a cheerful concept of them playing around as well as laughing. The concept is a teenage man child Romeo as well as a daughter Juliette inwards love. The vocal is non appealing sexually at all. There's also a b-side 'Boy Meets Girl' as well as they sing, "I dream of coming together the daughter Juliette over again as well as falling inwards love". You're weird if y'all uncovering it sexual or erotic.

Share this post