Update Crimson Velvet's Win On Inkigayo Doesn't Brand Sense?
Tuesday, 1 January 2019
Edit
#1 nominees on Inkigayo were Naul, Red Velvet, as well as Melomance. Red Velvet won #1 yesteryear having a sum Youtube grade (3500). BTS' 'Mic Drop' wasn't nominated.
Youtube views from November 26 6PM to December three 6PM:
BTS: 22,698,140
Red Velvet: 5,891,966
The Youtube scores should've been:
BTS: 3500 (full score)
Red Velvet: 908
The sum scores for #1 nominees should've been:
Naul: 5916
Red Velvet: 5703
Melomance: 4990
Conclusion:
1) BTS should've been nominated since they charted inside transcend 150 on Gaon.
2) Even if BTS wasn't nominated, Naul should've won #1, non Red Velvet.
-
Pann: Please laissez passer on a feedback to Red Velvet's win on Inkigayo
1. [+202, -6] To those who are claiming that they solely count songs inside transcend xxx - BTS' results for this calendar week are much ameliorate than end week's. They were #6 end calendar week already. I don't convey problems amongst Red Velvet winning #1 simply cease coming upwards amongst nonsense.
2. [+189, -9] It is weird. They would've won #1 solely amongst BTS' Youtube grade as well as Twice/Black Pink's popularity.
Related:
3. [+167, -8] BTS' results for this calendar week are ameliorate than end week... And since when did they always tell they solely reckon transcend 30?
4. [+94, -2] The OP isn't maxim that BTS should've won #1. They're maxim that Red Velvet could never larn a sum Youtube grade because BTS' Youtube views are a wall. Therefore, Naul should've won #1.
5. [+87, -2] Right at i time all of the online communities are going crazy as well as calling it a manipulation. Inkigayo needs to laissez passer on a feedback.
6. [+78, -1] I'm certain this is written yesteryear a Naul fan. Naul fans are already going crazy on other sites. How tin you lot tell that this is written yesteryear an Army?
