Update Suzy Faces A Trial On Youtuber Yang Yewon's Incident
Monday 31 December 2018
Edit
Article: Studio reps, "We volition receive got legal actions" vs. JYP reps, "We volition larn legal consultations"
Source: Sports Choson via Naver
(Summary of the incident - Youtuber Yang Yewon confessed that a photograph studio forced her to hold upwards a model for sexual photos. People started a petition for an investigation of the studio & Suzy posted supporting posts on her Instagram including how to bring together the petition. After Suzy's post, the speed of the petition growth increased past times 10 times. But it got revealed that the defendant studio was already sold & bought past times a novel possessor who isn't related to this incident. The possessor is expressing that they're suffering heavy damages financially in addition to socially.)
1. [+15149, -2578] I don't empathize why they're putting the responsibleness on Suzy. The shout of the studio was already all over community sites at dawn. It's irony that Suzy has to hold upwards responsible when she didn't fifty-fifty shout the studio. They should hold upwards suing the guilty studio, then.
2. [+5639, -874] What did Suzy create wrong? It's non similar she mentioned the studio name.
3. [+5091, -565] Thanks to Suzy, to a greater extent than people know that the studio is innocent. Suzy doesn't deserve to hold upwards sued.
4. [+4330, -558] Their mindset is weird. They should sue the someone who sold the studio to them, non Suzy.
5. [+1680, -204] JYP, delight larn to run instead of hiding behind your artist.
-
Article: Ones Picture reps, "We receive got zippo to create amongst Yang Yewon's incident... We volition receive got civil suits against Suzy"
Source: Xports News via Nate
1. [+4703, -1530] Why should Suzy hold upwards responsible? She didn't disclose the studio name. They desire her to hold upwards responsible because she's a famous figure? They desire a compensation?
2. [+4053, -1476] How is this Suzy's fault? If she was wrong, in addition to thus she was wrong. What's amongst the civil suits?
3. [+2724, -1485] I knew they'd sue her. Suzy was rash.
4. [+293, -119] It's similar how the giant sponge cake flopped because of a TV show. The content of the demo was revealed to hold upwards simulated but the cake draw organisation even thus flopped. It's the same province of affairs for the studio, Suzy is at fault.
5. [+269, -62] On Suzy's SNS, the shout of the studio was revealed. That's why the influence of a famous figure could hold upwards dangerous. Suzy posted on SNS inwards expert faith but it led to the innocent studio getting sacrificed. I actually similar Suzy but she was rash amongst this incident. And her aftermath actions were non build clean at all. I would've likewise sued her if I was the studio owner. Their studio was doing fine but their draw organisation is nigh to flop because they got falsely defendant of a sexual crime. Do y'all intend they'll merely remain put? As a breadwinner of a family, y'all can't merely remain quiet.
-
Article: [Official statement] JYP reps, "Suzy apologized to Ones Picture... We volition follow legal advice"
Source: Xports News via Nate
1. [+3074, -753] Suzy alone wanted to assist the investigation going but she'll receive got to receive got legal responsibilities... She should've been to a greater extent than thoughtful considering her influence. It's pitiable that her expert intentions are buried ㅠㅠ
2. [+2761, -852] Suzy did it inwards expert faith but it caused an unintentional damage. Before Suzy apologized on SNS, she tried to apologize personally but the studio told her to create it through a lawyer. I intend Suzy tried her best.
3. [+2123, -595] So Suzy tried to apologize personally earlier she apologized on SNS on the 19th.
4. [+187, -81] So many innocent people got damaged because of famous figures' mistakes. Actor Kim Young Ae's draw organisation flopped because of the PD Lee Young Don's mistake. The storey on the giant sponge cake wasn't truthful but the cake even thus flopped in addition to the draw organisation holders got into debt. Suzy is responsible for flopping a business.
5. [+166, -52] People shielding Suzy hand me goosebumps. Whether she did it inwards expert faith or not, she didn't fifty-fifty interrogation properly earlier running her fingers carelessly. Because of that, a draw organisation is suffering a big damage. Yet all y'all necessitate is an apology? ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
-
Pann: Suzy is probable to hold upwards sued
1. [+109, -40] But it's truthful that Suzy was a fleck rash amongst this one... It would've been fine if Suzy supported Yang Yewon later on knowing to a greater extent than details.
2. [+89, -81] Rather than Suzy, shouldn't the studio sue the someone who started the petition? Suzy didn't intent to flop a studio, she encouraged the petition because she felt for Yang Yewon.
3. [+71, -20] I got thus shocked that people idea Suzy did a expert affair because she even thus made it a big issue. So y'all intend it's OK fifty-fifty though it's false? What nonsense is that?
4. [+48, -9] I actually don't similar it when celebrities limited their opinions on social issues on their SNS. Because Suzy was acting rash, the studio possessor is nigh to larn into debt. Smart celebrities who went to transcend universities similar Kim Tae Hee never come upwards forrad to social issues. It's ever these celebrities without proper cognition similar Suzy who human activity rash... Same to Yoo Ah In.
5. [+44, -7] She did it inwards expert faith but she doesn't aid nigh the harm it caused? The "if false, in addition to thus nevermind" mentality is disgusting.