Suzy Faces A Trial On Youtuber Yang Yewon's Incident
Tuesday 8 December 2020
Edit
Article: Studio reps, "We volition receive got legal actions" vs. JYP reps, "We volition larn legal consultations"
Source: Sports Choson via Naver
(Summary of the incident - Youtuber Yang Yewon confessed that a photograph studio forced her to hold out a model for sexual photos. People started a petition for an investigation of the studio & Suzy posted supporting posts on her Instagram including how to bring together the petition. After Suzy's post, the speed of the petition growth increased past times 10 times. But it got revealed that the defendant studio was already sold & bought past times a novel possessor who isn't related to this incident. The possessor is expressing that they're suffering heavy damages financially as well as socially.)
1. [+15149, -2578] I don't empathize why they're putting the responsibleness on Suzy. The yell of the studio was already all over community sites at dawn. It's irony that Suzy has to hold out responsible when she didn't fifty-fifty yell the studio. They should hold out suing the guilty studio, then.
2. [+5639, -874] What did Suzy create wrong? It's non similar she mentioned the studio name.
3. [+5091, -565] Thanks to Suzy, to a greater extent than people know that the studio is innocent. Suzy doesn't deserve to hold out sued.
4. [+4330, -558] Their mindset is weird. They should sue the someone who sold the studio to them, non Suzy.
5. [+1680, -204] JYP, delight larn to operate instead of hiding behind your artist.
-
Article: Ones Picture reps, "We receive got zero to create amongst Yang Yewon's incident... We volition receive got civil suits against Suzy"
Source: Xports News via Nate
1. [+4703, -1530] Why should Suzy hold out responsible? She didn't unwrap the studio name. They desire her to hold out responsible because she's a famous figure? They desire a compensation?
2. [+4053, -1476] How is this Suzy's fault? If she was wrong, as well as hence she was wrong. What's amongst the civil suits?
3. [+2724, -1485] I knew they'd sue her. Suzy was rash.
4. [+293, -119] It's similar how the giant sponge cake flopped because of a TV show. The content of the present was revealed to hold out fake but the cake trouble organisation all the same flopped. It's the same province of affairs for the studio, Suzy is at fault.
5. [+269, -62] On Suzy's SNS, the yell of the studio was revealed. That's why the influence of a famous figure could hold out dangerous. Suzy posted on SNS inward expert organized faith but it led to the innocent studio getting sacrificed. I actually similar Suzy but she was rash amongst this incident. And her aftermath actions were non construct clean at all. I would've besides sued her if I was the studio owner. Their studio was doing fine but their trouble organisation is close to flop because they got falsely defendant of a sexual crime. Do you lot mean value they'll merely remain put? As a breadwinner of a family, you lot can't merely remain quiet.
-
Article: [Official statement] JYP reps, "Suzy apologized to Ones Picture... We volition follow legal advice"
Source: Xports News via Nate
1. [+3074, -753] Suzy exclusively wanted to assist the investigation going but she'll receive got to receive got legal responsibilities... She should've been to a greater extent than thoughtful considering her influence. It's lamentable that her expert intentions are buried ㅠㅠ
2. [+2761, -852] Suzy did it inward expert organized faith but it caused an unintentional damage. Before Suzy apologized on SNS, she tried to apologize personally but the studio told her to create it through a lawyer. I mean value Suzy tried her best.
3. [+2123, -595] So Suzy tried to apologize personally earlier she apologized on SNS on the 19th.
4. [+187, -81] So many innocent people got damaged because of famous figures' mistakes. Actor Kim Young Ae's trouble organisation flopped because of the PD Lee Young Don's mistake. The floor on the giant sponge cake wasn't truthful but the cake all the same flopped as well as the trouble organisation holders got into debt. Suzy is responsible for flopping a business.
5. [+166, -52] People shielding Suzy laissez passer me goosebumps. Whether she did it inward expert organized faith or not, she didn't fifty-fifty question properly earlier running her fingers carelessly. Because of that, a trouble organisation is suffering a big damage. Yet all you lot need is an apology? ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
-
Pann: Suzy is probable to hold out sued
1. [+109, -40] But it's truthful that Suzy was a chip rash amongst this one... It would've been fine if Suzy supported Yang Yewon afterward knowing to a greater extent than details.
2. [+89, -81] Rather than Suzy, shouldn't the studio sue the someone who started the petition? Suzy didn't intent to flop a studio, she encouraged the petition because she felt for Yang Yewon.
3. [+71, -20] I got hence shocked that people idea Suzy did a expert matter because she all the same made it a big issue. So you lot mean value it's OK fifty-fifty though it's false? What nonsense is that?
4. [+48, -9] I actually don't similar it when celebrities limited their opinions on social issues on their SNS. Because Suzy was acting rash, the studio possessor is close to become into debt. Smart celebrities who went to transcend universities similar Kim Tae Hee never come upwardly frontwards to social issues. It's ever these celebrities without proper cognition similar Suzy who deed rash... Same to Yoo Ah In.
5. [+44, -7] She did it inward expert organized faith but she doesn't tending close the harm it caused? The "if false, as well as hence nevermind" mentality is disgusting.