Should People Over 65 Live On Non Allowed To Vote?
Thursday, 16 January 2020
Edit
Pann: Controversial topic inwards Europe
1. [+465, -37] 65 is also young. I recall lxxx is the correct age.
2. [+226, -34] This is a nonsense ㅋㅋㅋㅋ Even Korea is becoming an extremely aged gild as well as it's worse for Europe. Only featherbrained people would tell that.
3. [+219, -200] I larn their point. This claim came out during Brexit. Because the senior degree supported Brexit, the progressive immature degree got upset as well as came upwards alongside the claim. We recall it's a nonsense because nosotros bring a democratic regime simply fifty-fifty during Park Geun Hye's government, people wanted historic menstruation over lxxx to last banned from voting. And I recall the minimum historic menstruation to vote should last lower.
4. [+99, -2] Why produce people desire the minimum historic menstruation to vote to last lower? If teenagers tin vote, why non allow unproblematic schoolhouse kids vote, too? You recall this is picking a degree president?
5. [+95, -3] Then who's going to speak for the rights of seniors?
6. [+85, -0] It can't fifty-fifty last a joke because deprivation of vote way deprivation of citizen. It's equivalent to women non existence able to vote inwards the past. The correct to vote is the symbol of democracy. It can't last done.
7. [+61, -5] How stupid of them to recall that alone immature adults are the future...
8. [+45, -2] Wow, we're inwards the generation of 120 age, as well as hence sixty is alone a one-half of the lifetime. How tin they tell it's non the future?
9. [+42, -1] The politicians also postulate the sixty historic menstruation limit. Well, they won't produce their move regardless of their historic menstruation anyways.
10. [+29, -1] What is this... They alone run into the hereafter as well as non the present. The idea of taking away the correct to vote from those over sixty is poor enough.