Netizens Incredulous To Believe Adore's 'Cookie' Clarification
Source: Everyday Economy via Naver
1. [+444, -31] I kept thinking the lyrics sounded weird. It's all nearly seducing a human with a cookie? How he'll eat i as well as desire to a greater extent than as well as come upwards over for around more? It's way to a greater extent than natural to recall the cookie agency something else which is why it's therefore problematic.
2. [+228, -20] If that's how Americans are reading it inward their culture... therefore I don't encounter how these lyrics tin move travel taken whatever other way. These are teen minors singing it. It's embarrassing that K-Pop is writing such lyrics.
3. [+217, -19] Cookie is non an uncommon slang similar they're trying to say. And it makes no sense that they had an American native confirm that... because of course of written report if you lot merely inquire nearly the give-and-take 'cookie', certain it sounds normal since anyone tin move tell "want a cookie?" or "I possess got cookies at home"... but to possess got a daughter grouping trip the calorie-free fantastic along to it inward an ambiguous manner... it totally agency the slang version. Sure, it mightiness hateful something else inward Commonwealth of Australia or New Zealand but inquire whatever adult inward the US, Canada, or UK, as well as exhibit them the music video with it. Any normal someone would freak out.
4. [+155, -9] New Jeans dissonance marketing is no joke
5. [+72, -4] You can't enshroud the truth similar this. Anyone inward the idol manufacture knows that Min Hee Jin has been problematic with her concepts since her SM days.
6. [+62, -5] When I get-go heard the song, I thought it was impressive that they managed to write something therefore s*xual inward a modern way similar this. What I don't empathize is why they chose to write the lyrics this way at all if they didn't desire earth to assume the incorrect way? No affair how hard I endeavour to operate past times on this... the members are merely also young. None of this would've been a work had they been whatever older.
7. [+52, -2] Burning a CD? Are the members fifty-fifty one-time plenty to know what a CD looks like?
8. [+51, -3] Just travel honest as well as acknowledge that this is what you lot wanted. The vocal itself has such a weird vibe to it.
9. [+42, -2] They genuinely recall they tin move merely seat their hands over their eyes as well as human activity similar they don't encounter it. Do they genuinely recall they tin move fool the public? Sure, maybe the younger members are also immature to know anything, but you're genuinely telling me that the producers as well as writers of this vocal had no idea? Then how are you lot going to explicate Nicki Minaj having an entire vocal talking nearly a cookie? This agency genuinely thinks they tin move enshroud the heaven if they agree their mitt up. They mightiness teach away with fooling their Korean fans but how are they going to explicate this to their international fandom? Because they won't believe this at all.
10. [+40, -3] "The feeling of creating a practiced song, similar baking a cookie" ㅋㅋㅋ Are they non able to acknowledge to themselves that this excuse merely sucks? They brand 'cookie' audio similar something therefore wholesome that this mightiness merely travel a grouping produced past times EBS afterward all.
11. [+29, -2] It's funny to me that they possess got one-half the vocal inward English linguistic communication but are forthwith claiming that they didn't recall it to travel taken the American way ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
12. [+20, -1] It's gotten fifty-fifty weirder with the agency's clarification. I recall the translator/interpreter's agreement of the lyrics sounds to a greater extent than convincing.
13. [+17, -2] English linguistic communication speaking countries are telling you lot that the give-and-take is used inward a s*xual context therefore why does their agency hold to deny it? They are doing this to immature kids, what are they thinking?
14. [+11, -1] This whole thing sounds similar a parody... similar their agency is genuinely trying to gaslight us into thinking that you're a p*rvert if you lot hear it whatever other way than what they're telling you lot it means
15. [+9, -2] Just because you lot didn't "intend to hateful it that way" doesn't hateful the people didn't accept the intention to hateful that way. Their agency couldn't possess got handled it this way if they genuinely cared nearly the feedback their international fans are giving them.
16. [+8, -1] There's definitely a vibe to the vocal that makes it hard to remove heed to with whatever immature children around...
17. [+4, -0] But did anyone genuinely await them to travel similar "Oof! You totally caught us trying to brand our pocket-sized members sing a s*xual vocal " of course of written report they're going to deny it ㅋㅋ
18. [+4, -0] This reminds me of FIESTAR's 'One More Time' controversy. Everyone could tell the vocal was nearly a threesome but they tried to clarify it maxim it's nearly bespeak for to a greater extent than KakaoTalk game hearts or something, which therefore led to people blaming the everyone who institute the lyrics problematic for existence weird as well as whatnot, which is what's happening here.
19. [+4, -0] They claim the lyrics possess got been "confirmed past times English linguistic communication literature professors, translators as well as interpreters, native speakers, as well as foreigners" but peradventure instead they should remove heed to the opinions of the actual consumers of New Jeans' music as well as how they're taking the give-and-take cookie to mean...
--